Patient anthropometric information, previous or family history of malignancies, which includes pancreatic cancer, danger factors, including genetic mutations, and predisposing ailments. Within this section, we included the item “Allergies” to drug or no drug and contrast medium. The “Clinical Evaluation” section collected prior examination results, a genetic panel, benefits of histopathological examination on biopsy specimen, carbohydrate antigen 19.9 (Ca 19.9) level, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, blood count, serum creatinine, liver function, and clinical symptoms. The “Imaging Protocol” section for CT-SR incorporated information around the gear utilised, which includes information on the reconstruction algorithm and slice thickness. Moreover, we collected information on contrast study protocol, like information around the contrast study phase, too as data regarding the contrast medium, and ongoing adverse events. The “Imaging Protocol” section for MRI-SR included data around the scanner brand and model, protocol information as conventional or abbreviated, and sequences. Also, we collected information on contrast study protocol, like data around the contrast study phase, at the same time as information regarding the contrast medium. The “Report” section included data on: 1. Lesion: tumor visible or not visible and indirect signs; size; structure; site; vascularity. 2. Arteries: normal or variant anatomy; atherosclerotic; presence of vessel involvement; distance among celiac trunk and infiltrated hepatic artery five mm.Diagnostics 2021, 11,5 of3. Veins: standard or variant anatomy; thrombosis (neoplastic or not neoplastic); presence of vein involvement; for superior mesenteric vein, longitudinal extent of infiltration 20 mm and tumor involvement of 1st jejunal loop. Moreover, in this section, we incorporated data on biliary ducts, posterior lamina, locoregional diffusion (including stomach, spleen, treits, liver, etc.), node stage, and for MRI-SR, liver metastases; for CT-SR, metastases stage (such as liver, bone, lung, etc.), peritoneal carcinomatosis, too because the presence of incidental radiological findings, like acute pancreatitis and pulmonary embolism. 3.2. Consensus Agreement Within the initially round, as reported in Table 1, for CT-SR, all sections by 20 panelists received far more than a great Apraclonidine Technical Information rating. The general mean score from the professionals was four.85 (variety 2). The C correlation coefficient was 0.85 for the CT staging structured NSC-3114 custom synthesis Report and the sum of scores was 1844 (92.20 5.57). Table 2 reports single score and sum of scores of 20 panelists for the MR staging structured report in the initially round. Inside the initially round, as reported in Table 2, all sections received extra than a fantastic rating. The all round mean score of the authorities was 4.73 (variety 1). The C correlation coefficient was 0.82 as well as the sum of scores for the MR structured report was 1798 (89.90 6.64). Table 3 reports single score and sum of scores of 20 panelists for the CT staging structured report inside the second round: all sections received a lot more than a great rating. The overall mean score in the experts was 4.87 (variety three), the C correlation coefficient was 0.94, and the sum of scores was 1850 (92.50 four.03). Inside the second round for the MR structured report, as reported in Table 4, all sections by 20 panelists received additional than a good rating. The all round imply score in the experts was 4.91 (variety 3), the C correlation coefficient was 0.93, and also the sum of scores for the MR structured report was 1108 (93.35 three.28). For both the CT and MR pancreas s.