E are presented. To compare unadjusted power and nutrient intake estimated
E are presented. To examine unadjusted energy and nutrient intake BRD4, Human (His-Flag) estimated by the two techniques, the 4-d FR and the DQ, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed and Spearman correlation coefficients had been calculated. Nutrient density was obtained by dividing the estimated nutrient intake (g/d, mg/d, g/d) by total power intake (MJ/d)(17). Correlation analyses on urinary alkylresorcinol metabolites were adjusted for creatinine (alkylresorcinols mol/l)/(creatinine mmol/l). Since mostCharacteristics from the study participants are presented in Table 1. Mean age was 65 years plus the proportion of obese folks (BMI 30 kg/m2) was 11 . The proportion of current smokers was 10 plus the proportion of males having a greater degree of education corresponded towards the general population in Sweden(19), which was around 33 . There were no statistically significant differences amongst the two groups of guys in any of your background characteristic variables; therefore all additional analyses have been performed with both groups combined. Mean average daily intakes of dietary variables estimated by the two diverse solutions (DQ and FR) are shown in Table two. Reported energy intake was lower measured by the DQ compared with FR (8523 v. 9249 kJ/d (2037 v. 2211 kcal/d); P = 014, respectively). Of the macronutrients, the largest discrepancy was shown for protein where the reported mean every day intake was on average 20 g decrease in the DQ compared with all the FR. Reported intake of GM-CSF, Human (Tag Free) complete grains (wheat and rye) was higher within the DQ compared with all the FR (48 v. 34 g; P 001). Reported every day intake of total phyto-oestrogens was greater in the FR compared with all the DQ (P 001). Rye bread contributed most to the phyto-oestrogen intake for both methods (91 from the intake in FR and 85 in DQ) and the estimated median intake of rye bread was 70 g/d in FR and 41 g/d in DQ. Reported intake of phyto-oestrogens did not differ between males with or with out prostate cancer estimated by either in the approaches (information not shown) and practically all phyto-oestrogens (99 ) were derived from lignans.journals.cambridge.org/jnsTable 1. Traits of study population of males with and with no prostate cancer (Imply values, standard deviations and ranges for continuous data; numbers and percentages for categorical information) Males with prostate cancer (n 30) Mean 66 82 49 10 39 nSDAll guys (n 61) Imply Age (years) Weight (kg) Alkylresorcinols, total (mol/l) DHBA (mol/l) DHPPA (mol/l) 65 85 47 ten 37 n BMI (category) Regular weight (184 kg/m2) Overweight (259 kg/m2) Obese (30 kg/m2) Smoking Current smoker Prior smoker Non-smoker EducationCompulsory school Upper secondary school University or college degreeSDMen without prostate cancer (n 31) Mean 65 88 46 10 36 nSDRange 571 6540 348 01 290Range 590 6526 451 11 390Range 571 6540 357 005 221P 01 08 03 04 03 14 50 9 412 13 64 11 524 15 32 73 2509 28 26 7 six 30 25 18 22 20 45 42 11 9 49 41 30 36 33 18 10 2 3 15 12 8 11 10 60 33 6 ten 50 40 26 36 33 10 16 five three 15 13 10 11 10 32 51 16 08 9 48 41 03 32 35 32DHBA, three,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid; DHPPA, 3-(3,5-dihydroxyphenyl)-1-propanoic acid. Independent-samples t test. Independent-samples Mann hitney U test. 2. Missing data n 1.We identified a statistically substantial correlation in between the two methods for reported whole grain wheat and rye intake, too as for intake of macronutrients, except for protein (Table two). The lowest correlation coefficient was observed for lignans as well as the highest for alcohol intake. The correlation on iso.