On the surface of your GNS. In Figure 6c, the GNS, resulting from electrochemical exfoliation, includes a common folded structure with fewer layers, a transparent, flat surface, and also a substantial spreading chord ratio. Compared with Figure S6, the entire surface of GNS modified by P3HT (6000) was uniformly covered 10 of with a gray Lanifibranor Epigenetic Reader Domain organic material texture and has a distinctly deep strip texture in some locations 15 in Figure 6d; thus, P3HT was not formed for the duration of deposition procedure, but formed in option [41,45].Figure 6. (a) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) pictures of GNS. (b) SEM photos of GNS@P3HT (6000). (c) Transmission Figure 6. (a) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of GNS. (b) SEM pictures of GNS@P3HT (6000). (c) Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) photos ofof GNS. (d) TEM imagesof GNS@P3HT (6000). electron microscopy (TEM) images GNS. (d)TEM photos of GNS@P3HT (6000).SEM may be utilized to characterize the internal microstructure on the membrane, as shown in Figure 7. The cross-section of pure PVDF was reasonably flat and there were some micro pits left by the process of heating and removing the solvent through the preparation of membranes in Figure 7a. In Figure 7b, GNS was oriented along the horizontal path in membranes, but its distribution was uneven having a significant agglomeration phe-Membranes 2021, 11,10 ofMembranes 2021, 11, xSEM could be employed to characterize the internal microstructure in the membrane, as shown in Figure 7. The cross-section of pure PVDF was reasonably flat and there were some micro pits left by the method of heating and removing the solvent throughout the preparation of membranes in Figure 7a. In Figure 7b, GNS was oriented along the horizontal path in membranes, but its distribution was uneven using a big agglomeration phenomenon. The interface amongst GNS and PVDF was clearly distinguished, which produced the interface much less compatible. Compared with Figure S7, GNS@P3HT (6000) has a superior dispersion in PVDF with no apparent agglomeration. GNS@P3HT (6000)/PVDF had a denser stacking with out an apparent cavity and apparent interface separation inside the cross section. The P3HT (6000) loading around the surface of GNS could lessen the interface Ritanserin custom synthesis thermal resistance in between GNS, thereby decreasing the scattering of phonon transfer among GNS, which facilitated the formation in the heat conduction pathway. For that reason, the thermal conductivity of 20 of 15 11 wt GNS@P3HT (6000)/PVDF are going to be greatly improved, which is often verified by the thermal conductivity test.Figure 7. SEM images of GNS/PVDF and GNS@P3HT/PVDF membranes: (a) PVDF; (b) 20 wt GNS/PVDF; (c) 20 wt Figure 7. SEM images of GNS/PVDF and GNS@P3HT/PVDF membranes: (a) PVDF; (b) 20 wt GNS/PVDF; (c) 20 wt GNS@P3HT (6000)/PVDF. GNS@P3HT (6000)/PVDF.3.3. Thermal Properties of GNS@P3HT/PVDF Membranes 3.3. Thermal Properties of GNS@P3HT/PVDF Membranes To confirm the effect of P3HT with distinctive molecular weights around the modified GNS, To verify the effect of P3HT with unique molecular weights on the modified GNS, the effect was verified by the in-plane thermal conductivity on the GNS@P3HT/PVDF the impact was verified by the in-plane thermal conductivity from the GNS@P3HT/PVDF membrane. The thermal conductivity of PVDF membranes enhanced together with the raise of membrane. The thermal conductivity of PVDF membranes enhanced with all the raise of filler content, as shown Figure 8a, Table S1 S1 and S2. The sequence of your influence of filler content, as shown inin Figure 8a, Tables and Tab.